Bookmark and Share

FOR Logo Friends of the River
 The voice of California's rivers
Friends of the River

RA masthead

email2 Tell A Friend

California River Awards: Friday, October 25
Don’t miss the river party of the year!
 
Next Friday evening, river advocates from around the state will gather at the California River Awards to celebrate two heroes of California’s rivers – David “Chicken” Nesmith and Representative Jared Huffman.
 
David NesmithDavid Nesmith, known fondly as “Chicken,” has been a driving force in environmental and river conservation communities for more than 30 years. He directed the Bay Chapter of the Sierra Club and has led campaigns at Friends of the Earth, Save the Bay, and National Land for People. Most recently, as Facilitator for the Environmental Water Caucus, David championed ecosystem restoration and limits to water exports from the Delta. While his work and accomplishments are legion, none is greater than his leadership in the successful decade-long effort working with California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Foothill Conservancy, Sierra Club, and Friends of the River to convince the East Bay Municipal Utility District’s Board of Directors to reverse the decision to raise Pardee Dam, saving, at least for now, a significant stretch of the Mokelumne River from inundation.
 
jared huffmanRepresentative Jared Huffman is an avid angler and member of the House Committee on Natural Resources and the House Budget Committee. In a remarkable feat for a freshman in Congress, Huffman successfully steered his bill adding Point Arena and the Garcia River estuary to the California Coastal National Monument out of the Natural Resources Committee in June. He has also ably opposed several environmentally destructive bills considered by the committee, including the bill to remove federal protection from a segment of the Merced Wild River. He is working closely with Friends of the River and other conservation groups to identify for protection potential Wild & Scenic rivers and other wild places on public lands in his district.
 
So join us next Friday, October 25th at the Golden Gate Club on the Presidio of San Francisco to honor these two river heroes. The California River Awards features fantastic food and wine, live entertainment, and a fabulous live and silent auction, all in support of California's beautiful rivers.
 

delta 2-2013Delta Tunnels Plan to be released on November 15
Katy Cotter, Legal Counsel
 
After many delays and stopped starts, the Natural Resources Agency has announced that it will release the public draft of the plan proposing the construction of giant twin tunnels beneath the Delta on November 15, 2013, though the lead agencies have already predicted yet another delay in its release due to the federal government shutdown. Once it is released, there will be a 120-day comment period on the so-called Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) EIS/EIR, during which the public can write letters or emails expressing concern with the project.  While we cannot be sure what the new draft will contain, if it resembles recent drafts it will continue to be a death sentence for Delta fish species and will be the catalyst for new upstream dams and increased political pressure to expand existing reservoirs  to fill the proposed tunnels.. See for example our fact sheets on the Shasta Dam and the Sites Offstream Reservoir project and their intimate connection with the BDCP.
 
This Plan proposes construction of three new intakes on a stretch of the Sacramento River near Hood.  Twin tunnels 150 feet deep would convey water to the existing pumping plants in the south Delta near Tracy. From there, water would be lifted into the canals that supply Southern California, the Santa Clara Valley, and the San Joaquin Valley. In other words, under the Plan, a large volume of water that currently flows down the Sacramento River and through the Delta will now be siphoned off near Hood (just south of Clarksburg).  Taking this freshwater flow out of the Delta will impair the habitat of multiple endangered species, including the Sacramento River Winter-Run Chinook Salmon, the Central Valley Spring-Run Chinook Salmon, the Central Valley Steelhead, the Southern Distinct Population Segment of the North American Green Sturgeon, and the Delta Smelt. Agencies such as the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Fish and Wildlife have also criticized the analysis, noting among other things, that the analysis of Plan’s benefits is overly optimistic. Notably, the Plan does nothing to improve Delta outflows even though there is broad scientific agreement that current outflow conditions are insufficient for protecting the Delta’s aquatic ecosystem.  The most recent version of the Plan aligned the tunnels to pass under Staten Island, which serves as key habitat for the beloved Sandhill Crane.
 
Friends of the River has submitted three letters to the fish agencies that are charged with approving the BDCP, detailing the many ways in which the BDCP fails to pass muster under the Endangered Species Act and other environmental laws. As these letters articulate, the BDCP must not just maintain endangered fish populations, they must recover declining populations, and the current BDCP has failed to demonstrate that it meets this standard. These letters have been posted on the BDCP web site (see letters dated September 25th, August 13th, and June 4, 2013).  These letters further explain why even the reduced footprint version of the Plan that was announced this past summer still fails to adequately protect threatened and endangered fish habitat and why CEQA and NEPA require much more rigorous analysis.
 
Stay tuned for more announcements on the BDCP.
 

6-20-13 viceSelling it: all things to all people
Ron Stork, Sr. Policy Advocate
 
Friends of the River is not exactly deep into the councils of the south-of-delta water contractors, so much of what we know of the big water grab (sometimes known as BDCP)  is from press accounts, conferences, planning documents, and other traditional sources of closely guarded information.
 
What you hear seems to depend on marketing targets.
 
Environmentalists and anglers hear that the big Delta tunnels are being built to restore fisheries and recover endangered species (although what we've seen from government fish agencies means average exports from the Delta have to go down, even with the big tunnels).
 
McCloud above Shasta Res 1-23-2013The Bureau of Reclamation tells us that operations from a raised Shasta Dam (and flooding part of the protected McCloud River) will prioritize fisheries over deliveries to contractors (although the tunnels EIR, designed in part to sell the tunnels to the water contractors, seems to model the reverse priority).
 
California’s Deputy Resources Agency Secretary Jerry Meral is on a talking tour selling the tunnels to the far ends of the state, and the press from it is disturbing.
 
For example, we read in The Desert Sun that Craig Ewing, vice-president of the Desert Water Agency says, " 'Noting that water levels have declined over the years in the aquifer that stores water for the Coachella Valley,' he said: 'We need the Delta supply,' " and 'The Delta tunnels plan would bring the area significantly larger flows of water and would make deliveries more reliable year after year,' Ewing said."
 
Kind of reminds me when Rep. John Doolittle, desperately trying to find some buyers for Auburn dam water, told a Palm Springs gathering that the big dam on the American could and should be used "to sweeten the Salton Sea."
 
Frankly, selling it is all about raising expectations. In this case, "water for everyone" is a dangerously unrealistic expectation to be selling in a state that has already reached "peak water," let alone "peak environmental water." Yes, that means that many California water sectors have already lived beyond their means and are going to have to conserve water.
 
However, that’s not what we are hearing. Instead, the unhealthy level of expectation from the tunnels selling-it campaign is best reflected in the news from the Porterville Recorder earlier this summer. There, the Tulare County Board of supervisors, eyeing the prospect of the big tunnels to the north state, noted, "The continued over-drafted groundwater basins of the Central Valley are also a very serious threat to the economic future of California agriculture, and the Central Valley is in dire need of the development and importation of more surface water to eliminate mining groundwater. The legislature should revisit Wild and Scenic Rivers status of the North Coast waters, where nearly one-third of California's water supply flows to the ocean, when there is such a demonstrated need to put available resources to their highest and best use."
 
California’s northcoast rivers are arguably the crown jewels of our combined state and national wild and scenic rivers. I'm hoping that the tunnels and the selling-it campaign don't lead there, but I fear it already has. 
 

Ron StorkRiver Currents
Ron Stork, Sr. Policy Advocate  
 
River Ambassador Notes: Japan
 
It does seem a little odd to some: fighting off a government-proposed dam on a beautiful mountain river. Perhaps even more so for the citizens of Japan accustomed to the disciplines of the civic harmony of their culture and the overwhelming power of their Ministry of Construction.
 
Thus it was no surprise to me that I had been invited to spend the day talking about Auburn dam to some professors and students of Kumamoto University in Japan.
 
I have done this several times before. The first time was in Washington, D.C. in the 1990s during one of the Auburn dam campaigns of that era.  U.N. style translators with headphones. Members of the Japanese Diet, river activists, academics. It was an intense day.
 
Auburn Journal Dam CartoonNHK (Japan Broadcasting Corp.) TV even did a documentary of the Auburn dam fight back then. Views of Traci Sheehan (FOR American River Campaign director then, now director of the Foothill Water Network) collecting EIS documents from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for review and public comment. Then telling the story of Rep. John Doolittle’s unmistakable misrepresentation of facts in one of his Dear Colleague letters. Congress failing to back the Corps. It must have been fascinating TV in Japan.
 
This time it was a more quiet discussion amongst a Corps representative, a longtime local flood-control agency official, Sacramento State University folks, the visitors from Japan, and me. We heard of the fight to stop their Ministry of Construction from building another dam on the Kawabe River. We told the history of our struggles on the American.
 
Both dams are on hold, stalled for the indefinite future, the rivers still not protected.
 
Although there was much discussion about the formal institutions of government decision-making, for me the discussion brought home the vital role that all of us play in saving rivers.
 
May there be many Friends of the River, all over the world. And may we take time to be ambassadors for rivers whenever the opportunity arises.
 
Auburn Dam sketchMeanwhile, stateside
 
There’s some counter river ambassadors in the world too.
 
The Auburn Dam Council is the local civic booster club for the construction of the Auburn dam on the American River. Their last meeting was about raising money for another feasibility report for Auburn dam. The last one didn’t turn out very well, so they want to do another one.
 
They have the sympathies of the two Congressmen (Reps. McClintock and LaMalfa) who represent the Congressional districts that the NF American courses through.
 
We probably need to be watchful there.
 
In the meantime, we need to be sharing the American River (as well as the other rivers in California) with others in as many ways as possible: river trips, field trips, writing about them, talking about them, press and elected-official outreach, photos, histories, maps, videos, recruiting new members. And yes, we could use the money and people power necessary to commission our own reports. In a nutshell, we all need to find ways of accomplishing our mission better. After all, rivers without friends are rivers that may only have a short future.
 
Tim Palmer, Middle Fork Smith River ThumbnailAnd even on the Smith
 
America’s leading wandering river ambassador, Tim Palmer, needs no admonishment to tell the stories of American rivers---and make public pleas to save them. This time it is about the mostly protected Smith River (right: picture by Tim Palmer of the Smith River featured on FOR's website banners) in the very northeast tip of California. When you think of the Smith, you think of redwoods and pristine, clear, clean water.
 
Tim is concerned about the threat to part of the Smith River headwaters from a huge potential corporate nickel mining venture on an Oregon tributary of the Smith.
 


Help Protect Gray Wolves And Bring Them Back To California!
Steve Evans, Wild & Scenic River Program
 
The gray wolf was extirpated from California more than 90 years ago. It almost became extinct in the United States due largely to over-hunting and trapping. But thanks to the Endangered Species Act, the gray wolf has made a dramatic come-back in the western Great Lakes, northern Rockies, and parts of the Pacific northwest. Today, more than 5,000 wolves live in the lower 48 states, about 2,000 of them in west, including 100 wolves in the eastern regions of Washington and Oregon.
 
10-16 Wolf-OR7-DFG-Shinn-wm-300x203Astoundingly, a lone male wolf, identified by wildlife biologists as OR7 (pictured to the left) and knick-named “Journey” by Oregon school children, wandered into California and spent much of 2012 exploring the wild lands of the northeastern region of the state. OR7 has since returned to eastern Oregon but his visit raised the hopes of wild river, wilderness, and wildlife advocates that gray wolves will soon return to live in our state’s wilderness areas.  OR7 has since returned to eastern Oregon but his visit raised the hopes of wild river, wilderness, and wildlife advocates that gray wolves will soon return to live in our state’s wild places.
 
10-16 OR7 in CalifOR-7 proved that northern California has high quality habitat for gray wolves. In a futile search for a mate, this young male wandered through some of the least developed and most pristine lands found anywhere in our state (see map of OR7’s travels from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife). OR7 must have found the Lassen National Forest to be particularly inviting, since he spent several weeks exploring the proposed Wild & Scenic River canyons of Antelope, Mill, and Deer Creeks (pictured below). He even traveled as far west as the proposed Sacramento River National Recreation Area (just north of Red Bluff).
 
Scientific studies have shown that as top-of-the-food-chain predators, gray wolves are vitally important to the functioning of healthy ecosystems. They cull sick animals from deer and elk herds, keep in check rabbits and other small mammal populations, and they are also opportunistic scavengers. Research has also shown that gray wolves have been part of California’s cultural heritage for thousands of years. Native American linguistic and cultural evidence indicates that the wolf was found throughout the state before it was extirpated by hunters, trappers, and ranchers.
 
10-16 DeerCk1_SEvansIf the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has it way, the recovery of the gray wolf could falter and we may never see this important predator return to California. In June, the agency announced its intention to eliminate Endangered Species Act protection for gray wolves and abandon all restoration efforts except for the Mexican gray wolf in the southwest. Delisting means that once again gray wolves can be hunted and trapped with impunity. Without federal protection, it is unlikely that the gray wolf will recover sufficiently to re-inhabit California and their overall population in the west will likely decline.
 
The USFWS is soliciting public comments on its delisting proposal until Oct. 28, 2013. Please send an email today to urging the agency to retain Endangered Species Act protection for the gray wolf and to work to restore gray wolves to California. Below is a sample email. Feel free to cut and paste and add your own personal comments.  To comment on the proposed delisting of gray wolves, go to:
 
 
You may also mail a hard copy of your comments (postmarked by Oct. 28, 2013) to:
 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Attn: FWS-HQ-ES-2013-0073
Division of Policy and Directives
4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042-PDM
Arlington, VA 22203
 
(Sample Comment Letter/Email below)
 
I’m writing to oppose the USFWS’ recommendation to remove Endangered Species Act protection for most of the gray wolf population in the United States. Although the gray wolf is doing well in much of its current range, the recovery of this important predator species is not complete. This decision could derail wolf recovery efforts in northern California and other areas where there is plenty of suitable wild habitat but currently no wolves.
 
Delisting will prematurely turn wolf management over to the states. Many western states are promoting anti-wolf policies that promote hunting and trapping and that could lead once again to the decline of this magnificent creature towards extinction.
 
As we discovered with OR7, there is plenty of suitable habitat in northern California for wolves. Californians strongly support continued protection and recovery of the gray wolf. In a recent poll of 500 likely voters in California, 80% agreed that the gray wolf should continue to be protected by the Endangered Species Act and 69% supported restoring wolves to suitable habitat in the state.
 
Early delisting of a protected species is a major and negative policy change. If similar early delisting actions had occurred for the bald eagle, American alligator, or peregrine falcon, they might have never recovered to the point they have today.
 
I demand that the USFWS retain full protection for the gray wolf and work to re-establish wolves here in California.
 
Thank you for your consideration.
(your signature line)
 

Fine Art Fundraiser for FOR in Sacramento – November 6th 5:30 to 7 pm
feather river painting small
Join local Sacramento artists and FOR staff for a
fine art fundraiser for Friends of the River featuring outdoor and river-themed works by artists from the Sacramento area will be held on Wednesday, November 6, 2013 at The Art Studios behind Michelangelo's Restaurant (1725 I Street). Admission is free and the fun starts at 5:30pm and runs until 7pm. Works river shadows smallfrom over a dozen artists will be on display and light refreshments will be served. Bring your checkbook - Fifty percent (50%) of any work sold that evening will be donated to Friends of the River! For more information contact us at info@friendsoftheriver.org  
 
 

10-16 Kings RiverRiver in the Spotlight: Kings River
Steve Evans, Wild & Scenic Rivers Program
  
The Kings River has carved one of the deepest canyons in North America, as it flows westward from the crest of the Sierra Nevada, dropping more than 13,000 feet to the upper limit of Pine Flat reservoir. The combination of excellent water quality, undisturbed shorelines, and distant views of hills, cliffs, and high mountains make the scenery of the Kings unique among Sierra Nevada.
  
The river provides one of California's most popular whitewater boating experiences. The Kings' largely class III whitewater attracts private and commercial boaters alike. But its natural flows, unmodified by upstream dams, can challenge rafters and kayakers with Grand Canyon-style hydraulics not found on other California rivers.
  
The Kings also offers numerous opportunities for camping, swimming, and angling. Three developed campgrounds and several primitive camp sites provide overnight accommodations. Hikers on the Kings River National Recreation Trail enjoy abundant spring wildflowers and a view of spectacular Garlic Falls. An anglers access trail follows much of the south side of the river.
  
This rugged river canyon supports a variety of plant communities, including mixed conifer forests, oak woodlands and grasslands, and chaparral. The diverse landscape provides habitat for many animal species, including mule deer, wolverine, bald and golden eagles, and California spotted owl. Fish biologists consider the Kings River to be one of the finest wild trout fisheries in the state. The native fishery attracts anglers from all over California.
  
Kings River Locator MapCongress added much of the Kings River and its upstream tributaries to the National Wild & Scenic Rivers System in 1987. It did not formally designate the lower 12 miles of the river directly upstream of the existing Pine Flat reservoir in the Wild & Scenic River System (although much of it was placed in a special management area not intended to be dammed), leaving the door cracked open for potential future construction of the proposed Rogers Crossing dam if Congress turns bad. Some argue it has. This nearly 600 foot-high dam would drown virtually the entire remaining undesignated segment of the Kings. In response to the recent energy crisis, the Kings River Conservation District (a downstream irrigation district) is reconsidering its Rogers Crossing dam proposal.
NEWSFLASH: River lovers have the opportunity to secure protection for this threatened segment of the Kings in the upcoming revision of the Sierra and Sequoia Forest Plans. The Forest Service is required to study the Wild & Scenic potential of rivers as part of the agency’s land and resource planning process. The Forest Service has already identified the unprotected segment of the Kings as eligible for Wild & Scenic protection, now all it has to do is make a recommendation to Congress that the Kings, like its upstream segments, be added to the National Wild & Scenic Rivers System. Friends of the River has urged the Forest Service to recommend protection for the river in the draft Forest Plan Revisions for the Sierra and the Sequoia Forests (the river just happens to form the boundary between the two Forests). The draft plans will be released for public review sometime in late 2014. Visit the Kings River Page on FOR’s website.

 
October 16, 2013
Volume 3, Number 10
 
The Voice of California's Rivers
Since 1973
 
In this issue

Features
California River Awards Oct 25th
Draft BDCP and EIR/EIS to be released
   on November 15, 2013
Selling it: all things to all people
River Currents by Ron Stork
Help Protect Gray Wolves And Bring
   Them Back To California!
Art Fundraiser for FOR in Sacramento on
   Nov 6 from 5:30 to 7pm

Departments
River in the Spotlight: Kings River
 

CRA 2013 Homepge
 

50waysbutton
join/donate FOR button
 
 
The River Advocate is published by Friends of the River contact us at info@friendsoftheriver.org
   
 
 

Home | Tell A Friend | Unsubscribe
Friends Of The River, 1418 20th St., Suite 100, Sacramento CA 95811
888.464.2477Powered by Convio

CRA2014 button

Take Action Red White Button

 50waysbutton

 join/donate FOR button

Questions or comments: